The war has sparked concerns over technocratic control being launched in response to this “opportunity.” Are these concerns justified in light of certain facts?
The trans-national character of the technocratic movement suggests that it is above all governments, yet does this mean a global technocratic state can be established?
Accomplishing such a goal would posit both a unity of intent, and the technological capacity to do so — the feasibility of which should be questioned.
Moreover, the emergence of a multipolar world indicates that should some technocratic systems be implemented, they would differ regionally in scope and in manner, not uniformly across the world.
.jpeg)
What has been communicated esoterically on the nature of evil indicates that its proxies have a strong tendency towards division.
There have been previous attempts to work against this tendency, but they are eventually led to fracture and dissolution, owing to an unstable unity of effort.
However, in the upcoming age, evil forces will be inhibited from coalescing their power. Rather, they will work through different means.
In contrast, unity, order and eternality are hallmarks of the spiritual planes, therefore cannot be used to describe the nature of evil.
The highest wisdom always produces a unanimous view among all men. Real wisdom is one, and it unites men again, whilst leaving them as free as possible, without any coercive authority. [1]