Technocracy in light of globalism
The war has sparked concerns over technocratic control being launched in response to the global re-structuring taking place, and the trans-national character of the technocratic movement suggests that it is above all governments, yet does this mean a global technocratic state can be established?
Accomplishing such a goal would posit both a unity of intent, and the technological capacity to do so — the feasibility of which should be questioned.
The advent of artificial intelligence seemed to present a new avenue for instituting a global economic order through technocratic methods rather than through military alliances, a transition “stewarded” by organizations like the World Economic Forum.
On the outside, it may appear there has been one group behind the scenes that steers the direction of such organizations.
Initially this may be the case, but over time the organization becomes overextended and can no longer be managed at the center, as seen in the 2026 Davos meeting.
This year, the fractures were so pervasive that Davos felt like a hall of broken glass, each shard reflecting a different power, priority and reality….
Bringing the world’s political and economic leaders together still matters. But credibility is no longer built by a small group at the top. The question facing the World Economic Forum is simple: can it reclaim the cooperation that has migrated to its periphery and bring it back to the centre where it belongs?